BioteCH4BioTwinSite twinBottleneckScenario labLogisticsModel explorerReconciliationWorkbook importGovernance

Excel reconciliation

The engine is compared against both source workbooks and against metered 2025 production. Divergence is reported and explained — never quietly reconciled.

Lines within 2%

3/16

Divergent lines

8

More than 10% away from the workbook figure

Open conflicts

3

Engine version

1.0.0

Engine versus workbook

Each line names its source sheet and explains why the engine differs where it does.

MetricWorkbookEngineDeltaStatusExplanation

Grid injection target (NEA limit)

Nm3/h · Yorks Process Flow v1 (07/08/26, Merged Models) — Levers!B6

853853+0%
match
The backward engine starts from the same NEA ceiling as the workbook's NEA-Backward Model.

Biomethane required (pre-propane)

Nm3/h · Yorks Process Flow v1 (07/08/26, Merged Models) — NEA-Backward Model

813.18813.18-0%
match
Grid target divided by (1 + propane uplift). A delta means the GCV levers have been amended.

Biogas required

Nm3/h · Yorks Process Flow v1 (07/08/26, Merged Models) — NEA-Backward Model

1,349.151,376.68+2%
close
Biomethane requirement divided by the derived CH4 fraction and BUU recovery.

Grid injection achievable

Nm3/h · Yorks Process Flow v1 (07/08/26, Merged Models) — NEA-Backward Model

665.68322.32-51.6%
divergent
The workbook binds on feedstock availability. The engine additionally applies biological derates, so it can sit lower.

Hydrolysis retention time

days · Yorks Process Flow v1 (07/08/26, Merged Models) — Bio Hydrolysis!B13

6.356.68+5.1%
close
Same first-order kinetics; the engine adds a pH factor the sheet omits.

Biogas yield per m3 of feed

Nm3/m3 · Yorks Process Flow v1 (07/08/26, Merged Models) — Bio Levers!C42

144.13105.93-26.5%
divergent
COD chemistry yield. The engine applies the biological efficiency multiplier on top of it.

Hydrolysis retention time (historic)

days · Bio Processing Model v1.3 (Cleaned 05/08/26)

6.356.68+5.1%
close
The engine reproduces the workbook's first-order kinetics; any delta comes from the pH factor, which the workbook omits.

Hydrolysis capacity

m3/day · Bio Processing Model v1.3 (Cleaned 05/08/26)

346.24329.36-4.9%
close
The engine additionally derates hydrolysis for measured downtime, so it should sit below the workbook figure.

Pasteurisation capacity

m3/day · Bio Processing Model v1.3 (Cleaned 05/08/26)

624608.61-2.5%
close
The workbook uses hold + fill/empty only. The engine splits fill, heat, transfer and empty and applies the compliance gate.

Digestion capacity

m3/day · Bio Processing Model v1.3 (Cleaned 05/08/26)

237.5154.65-34.9%
divergent
The workbook applies the DS-load rule alone. The engine takes the minimum of HRT, VS/COD loading, DS load and the volumetric push rate.

Biogas yield per m3 of feed

Nm3/m3 · Bio Processing Model v1.3 (Cleaned 05/08/26) vs Yorks Process BUU Back v2.2 (14/07/26)

144.78105.93-26.8%
divergent
The two workbooks disagree on the yield basis (COD-kinetic vs fixed 140 Nm3/m3). The engine applies the biological efficiency multiplier on top.

Biogas production

Nm3/day · Bio Processing Model v1.3 (Cleaned 05/08/26)

34,386.0412,484.85-63.7%
divergent
Difference is the combined effect of downtime and the methanogenic temperature / pH / solids derate.

Propane enrichment ratio

Nm3 per Nm3 biomethane · Yorks Process BUU Back v2.2 (14/07/26)

0.050.05-0%
match
Both derive propane from the GCV energy balance; a delta means the site GCV levers have been amended.

Feedstock digested

t/yr · Yorks Process BUU Back v2.2 (14/07/26) 2025 Actuals

69,872.3243,017.86-38.4%
divergent
Actual digested tonnage is the strongest calibration point; a large gap means capacity levers do not reflect how the plant was run.

Biogas produced

Nm3/yr · Yorks Process BUU Back v2.2 (14/07/26) 2025 Actuals

9,349,506.74,556,969.45-51.3%
divergent
Compares the modelled gas against metered production for the same site.

Average grid injection

Nm3/h · Yorks Process BUU Back v2.2 (14/07/26) 2025 Actuals

693.6322.32-53.5%
divergent
Metered average injection over the year, including downtime. The engine already nets downtime off, so these should be close.

Workbook conflict register

Where the two spreadsheets disagree with each other. The engine exposes both readings and applies the one recorded in the variable register.

TopicBio Processing Model v1.3Yorks Process BUU Back v2.2Impact if unresolvedResolution in the merged workbook
Site operating days360 (Bio Processing Model v1.3)365 (BUU Back v2.2)1.4% difference in annual output.
resolved — merged workbook Levers!B31 = 365
Hydrolysis pump hours12 h/day24 h/dayDoubles or halves pump-limited hydrolysis capacity.
resolved — merged workbook Levers!B54 = 24 h/day
Digester DS loading limit4.75 kg DS/m3/day5.0 kg DS/m3/day5% difference in the digestion ceiling.
resolved — merged workbook Bio Levers!C17 = 5.0
Methane content of biogasFlat 60% assumptionFlat 60% assumptionChanges biogas volume for the same methane mass.
resolved — merged workbook Bio Levers!C20 derives CH4% from BOD:COD
Biogas yield basisCOD-kinetic yieldFixed 140 Nm3/m3Changes gas output and every downstream capacity check.
resolved — merged workbook Bio Levers!C42 = 144.1 Nm3/m3 from COD chemistry
Feedstock availablen/a2025 actual tonnages (117,689 t/yr)Sets the modelled feed rate.
resolved — merged workbook Levers!B24 = 117,480 t/yr forward looking availability; 2025 actuals are a benchmark only
Pasteuriser heat recovery85%n/aChanges boiler fuel demand.
resolved — merged workbook Levers!B113 = 94.4%
Tanker cycle interpretationn/aSequential vs parallel not statedChanges loads per shift and transport capacity.
open — merged workbook Levers!D45 raises the same question
REL/HOL downtime allocationn/aHydrolysis and pasteurisation not split by siteMisattributes lost production between sites.
open — merged workbook leaves HOL hydrolysis/pasteurisation blank
Sm3 vs Nm3Nm3 throughoutGCV values quoted per Sm35.5% volume difference; must be converted explicitly.
open — merged workbook Levers!B81 B83 gives both bases